There is a very good skirmish game called 'Rangers of Shadowdeep' that uses something similar to this on an opposed roll basis. If my memory is correct both players roll a d20 and the damage is the difference. between the two after modifiers.
It's worth checking out, though IMO systems like these become a bit too complex because of the numbers involved.
The system that I very much enjoy is the 'Warmahcine' system (another wargame), where you have a Defence (How hard to hit), and an Armour (how tough) stat, and when you roll damage all weapons rolls 2d6 and it's the amount over the armour that is inflicted. The numbers are a bit more manageable in this kind of system.
I'll need to take a look for those - I've not done much wargaming to be honest so might be a decent idea to at least take a look for the mechanics.
As I mentioned in the end I was thinking about removing the "damage roll" all together and making whatever you roll above the target AC, plus your bonuses, and maybe plus a weapon modifier (thinking 0 for d4 weapons, 1 for d6 weapons, 2 for d8 etc) would work out alright.
This would make you feel very heroic and cinematic against weaker foes - but the fights against well armoured creatures would be very difficult.
Both systems are very good and have stuff you can take from them. I've done a simple adaptation of the Warmahcine concept for BX where you use d20 for attack rolls and 2d6 for all damage rolls, then add the power (POW) of the weapon ( 2 for a dagger, 3 for a light weapon, 4 for a normal weapon etc), plus strength + magic, for damage.
A lot of the issue with DnD combat at early levels is just how dangerous it is though. Adding the d20 damage concept would likely make it even more swingy and more lethal...which is fine if that's what you want.
My slight alteration to this rule is to have the number of success levels on an attack roll equate to the minimum number that can be rolled on the damage dice. For example, if you require a 13 to hit, but roll a 17, that's 4 success levels, so when you roll your D8 long sword damage you treat a result of 1-4 as a 4. This is capped at the weapons maximum damage, so 5 success levels with a dagger strike would still only result in 4 damage. I just got fed up with rolling a 19 to hit and thinking wow, what an awesome strike, to then roll a 1 on the damage dice. It didn't seem right after such a "solid" hit.
There is a very good skirmish game called 'Rangers of Shadowdeep' that uses something similar to this on an opposed roll basis. If my memory is correct both players roll a d20 and the damage is the difference. between the two after modifiers.
It's worth checking out, though IMO systems like these become a bit too complex because of the numbers involved.
The system that I very much enjoy is the 'Warmahcine' system (another wargame), where you have a Defence (How hard to hit), and an Armour (how tough) stat, and when you roll damage all weapons rolls 2d6 and it's the amount over the armour that is inflicted. The numbers are a bit more manageable in this kind of system.
I'll need to take a look for those - I've not done much wargaming to be honest so might be a decent idea to at least take a look for the mechanics.
As I mentioned in the end I was thinking about removing the "damage roll" all together and making whatever you roll above the target AC, plus your bonuses, and maybe plus a weapon modifier (thinking 0 for d4 weapons, 1 for d6 weapons, 2 for d8 etc) would work out alright.
This would make you feel very heroic and cinematic against weaker foes - but the fights against well armoured creatures would be very difficult.
Both systems are very good and have stuff you can take from them. I've done a simple adaptation of the Warmahcine concept for BX where you use d20 for attack rolls and 2d6 for all damage rolls, then add the power (POW) of the weapon ( 2 for a dagger, 3 for a light weapon, 4 for a normal weapon etc), plus strength + magic, for damage.
A lot of the issue with DnD combat at early levels is just how dangerous it is though. Adding the d20 damage concept would likely make it even more swingy and more lethal...which is fine if that's what you want.
My slight alteration to this rule is to have the number of success levels on an attack roll equate to the minimum number that can be rolled on the damage dice. For example, if you require a 13 to hit, but roll a 17, that's 4 success levels, so when you roll your D8 long sword damage you treat a result of 1-4 as a 4. This is capped at the weapons maximum damage, so 5 success levels with a dagger strike would still only result in 4 damage. I just got fed up with rolling a 19 to hit and thinking wow, what an awesome strike, to then roll a 1 on the damage dice. It didn't seem right after such a "solid" hit.